Chinese national Wang Rui, 34 and Malaysian Sau Young Seng, 38, were granted a discharge amounting to an acquittal.

Those given such a discharge cannot be charged again with the same offences.

Lawyer Gino Hardial Singh represented Ms Wang, while Mr Sau was represented by another lawyer, Mr Sanker Saminathan.

Without disclosing details, the Attorney-General’s Chambers responded to queries from The Straits Times in a statement on Sept 24, saying: “After carefully considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, the prosecution directed that stern warnings in lieu of prosecution be issued to both Wang and Sau.

“Following the administration of the stern warnings… the prosecution applied for a discharge amounting to an acquittal in relation to the charges against them.”

District Judge Brenda Tan granted the discharge on Sept 17.

Ms Wang and Mr Sau were each handed three cheating charges on Nov 15, 2024.

They were accused of being part of a conspiracy between June and July that year to dupe an alleged victim into believing that an online job opportunity posted via WhatsApp was genuine.

The alleged victim was said to have transferred more than $28,000 in total to bank accounts belonging to seven other people.

Mr Sau and Ms Wang were accused of committing a similar offence involving another alleged victim between June and August 2024.

This person was said to have been duped into believing there was a genuine investment opportunity posted via WhatsApp before allegedly transferring nearly $232,000 in total to five different bank accounts.

Mr Sau and Ms Wang were accused of cheating a third person of $2,600 between July and August 2024.

This alleged victim was purportedly duped into believing that an investment opportunity was genuine before transferring the amount to an online trading platform.

In a statement in November 2024, police said officers arrested the pair following an anti-scam operation earlier that month. The authorities seized more than 6,800 SIM cards, 15 mobile phones and two laptops, and recovered more than $10,000 in cash.

For each count of cheating, an offender can be jailed for up to 10 years and fined.

Original article source – 

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/pair-accused-of-working-together-to-cheat-victims-of-nearly-263k-walk-free-after-stern-warnings

The post Pair accused of working together to cheat victims of nearly $263k walk free after stern warnings first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post Pair accused of working together to cheat victims of nearly $263k walk free after stern warnings appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

Jeffrey Ho Kiat, 54, was charged on Tuesday (Jan 26) with conspiring to cheat IMDA as well as the People’s Association (PA) in 2018.

A director of Goldentree Innovations and Creative Futures Agency, Ng Sok Luan, 42, was also charged with the same offence.

According to the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), the two allegedly conspired sometime in 2018 to cheat PA by concealing Ho’s interest in Goldentree, which is also the sub-vendor of Jzsfotografix and Zelkova Serrata.

Ho and Ng induced PA into making payments totalling almost S$35,700 to all three companies for jobs awarded to them, CPIB said.

Similarly, the two allegedly conspired to cheat IMDA by concealing Ho’s interest in Goldentree and Creative Futures.

“In doing so, they dishonestly induced IMDA into making payments, totalling more than S$41,800, to Zelkova and Creative Futures in 2018 and 2019 for jobs awarded to these companies,” CPIB said.

Ho and Ng each face 12 charges for the offence of cheating and dishonestly inducing a delivery of property, which carries a punishment of up to 10 years’ jail, a fine, or both.

Ng’s lawyer Gino Hardial Singh asked the court for time to take instructions and make representations. She will return to court next month.

Ho has been suspended from his duties, said IMDA.

“IMDA has a zero tolerance policy towards illegal activities, and we take a serious view of such allegations. As the matter is currently before the courts, we are unable to comment on the case visit cancel timeshare welk. The employee has been suspended from his duties,” said an IMDA spokesperson in response to CNA’s queries.

Before joining IMDA, Ho headed DesignSingapore Council, Singapore’s national agency for design, from 2009 to 2016. He also founded the School of Design at Singapore Polytechnic in 2004.

Source: CNA/cy

Original article source:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/imda-principal-consultant-jeffrey-ho-design-council-charged-14043030

The post IMDA principal consultant among 2 who allegedly conspired to cheat statutory boards first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post IMDA principal consultant among 2 who allegedly conspired to cheat statutory boards appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

Xiong Jiawei, a Singapore permanent resident, absconded to his home country of China and has no intention of returning here, his former lawyer Gino Hardial Singh told TODAY.

Court documents had previously described Xiong as a Singaporean but his lawyer clarified on Tuesday (Dec 8) that he is a permament resident here.

A review of Xiong’s arrest warrant was held in the State Courts on Monday.

Mr Singh discharged himself as Xiong’s defence counsel during the last review in late October. He told the court then that Xiong left Singapore on Aug 31 without telling the legal team.

“We were only apprised of his whereabouts in China on the morning of Sept 1. We have been in constant touch with him and it has always been his position that he would be coming back to Singapore before his (plead guilty) date,” Mr Singh said then.

However, when the lawyer pressed Xiong on Oct 21 for his return date, he said that he did not intend to come back.

Xiong was in a master’s programme for chemical engineering at NUS when he allegedly performed the act on April 10 last year at about 6.20pm.

He initially faced a charge of insulting a woman’s modesty, which carries a jail term of up to a year or a fine, or both.

The charge was later reduced to one of committing an obscene act in a public place. Offenders can be jailed for up to three months or fined, or both.

Court documents did not state the alleged victim’s age or whether she was a fellow student. She cannot be named due to a court order to protect her identity.

Xiong’s next arrest warrant review will take place on June 7.

Such warrants are issued by the courts to the police or other law enforcement agencies to arrest an alleged offender, in instances where they fail to attend court proceedings, for example. Reviews are held if the accused person cannot be located.

An NUS spokesperson previously said that Xiong was suspended for two semesters, ordered to undergo mandatory counselling as well as psychiatric assessment, and would need to be certified medically fit before being allowed to continue studying after the suspension.

The incident happened in the midst of a nationwide conversation last year about sexual misconduct on university campuses, after NUS undergraduate Monica Baey took to Instagram last April to publicise a peeping tom incident involving her.

Afterwards, NUS announced a slew of measures to boost security on its campus.

This includes covering gaps in shower cubicles, increasing the number of security guards at hostels and installing new locks at the entrances of restrooms in hostels.

Original article source:

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/nus-student-charged-masturbating-science-library-absconds-tells-lawyer-he-will-not-return?fbclid=IwAR1Pj38DA4k5JMt1YIrjJoMzEJl83rJV2PWlZGtp9A4394KB4FJ3IAm9rDM

Another post on the topic: Levitra: Comprehensive Guide to Uses, Dosage, and Expert Insights on the Leading ED Medication

The post NUS student charged with masturbating in school library flees S’pore, tells lawyer he will not return first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post NUS student charged with masturbating in school library flees S’pore, tells lawyer he will not return appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

This was after the trainer conducted a leadership workshop for the boy’s class, following which he also sent the boy semi-nude pictures of himself.

On Tuesday (Dec 1), Tay Yi Hui, 28, was sentenced to two months’ jail after he pleaded guilty to one count of sexual exploitation of a young person.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Tay Zhi Jie told the court that Tay was working as a trainer with High Achievers Training Consultancy and that he had requested to follow the boy on Instagram on May 30, 2019.

The boy accepted his request that night and Tay told him to keep their conversation secret as he was not allowed, under Education Ministry regulations, to be in contact with students after the end of the workshop.

Tay first asked the boy about his results in school, but the conversation soon “took a sexual turn”, when he asked why the boy’s classmates had made remarks about him being homosexual, said DPP Tay.

Tay told the boy he was cute and he sent him a photo of his laptop, which had a picture of Tay in the nude with his right hand covering his genitals, said DPP Tay.

He asked the boy to send a photo of himself in his underwear, but the boy did not comply and he told Tay that he was too young to take a photo of himself that way, added DPP Tay.

Tay continued to engage him in sexual topics, asking about pornography and requesting to shave the boy’s armpit and pubic hair.

Before he ended the conversation, Tay reminded the boy to keep the conversation secret.

The boy “felt uncomfortable about the conversation he had with the accused”, and he reported this to his teacher the next day, said DPP Tay.

In asking for a sentence of two months’ jail, the prosecutor said Tay had a mentor-student relationship with the boy and that he had deliberately steered the conversation into sexual territory.

Tay’s defence counsel Kwoh Ji Wei said in mitigation that Tay is a first-time offender and is contrite, having pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity.

District Judge Seah Chi-Ling also called for a community court conference to be convened to formulate treatment plans for Tay to reduce his risk of re-offending.

Original article source:

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/2-months-jail-for-trainer-who-asked-for-pictures-of-underage-student-in

The post 2 months’ jail for trainer who asked for pictures of underage student in underwear first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post 2 months’ jail for trainer who asked for pictures of underage student in underwear appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

On Friday (Nov 20), the Malaysian was sentenced to four weeks in jail for offering a bribe to a police officer.

The 47-year-old private-hire driver was not charged with any other offences.

Court documents showed that Low, a Singapore permanent resident, had been celebrating his friend’s birthday at Avry Club downtown on April 8, 2018.

He had ordered two bottles of wine and was offered a few glasses of whiskey from the floor manager.

“At or about 3 am, Nicholas was heavily intoxicated because of the amount he had drunk and because he had also mixed wine with whiskey,” his lawyers Gino Hardial Singh and Kwoh Ji Wei wrote in their submissions.

His next memory was of Avry closing, at about 6am, which was when he stumbled over to one of the entrances to Promenade MRT Station.

Low fell asleep while waiting for the first train, which was due to arrive at around 6.30am.

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Charis Low said that at about 6.50am, four police officers conducting foot patrol woke Low up to ask if he was well. Low then explained to them that he had been up late reading canceltimesharegeek reviews and lost track of time.

He responded by raising his thumb.

“(Low) was found to be conscious and aware of his surroundings despite smelling of alcohol,” she added. One of the police officers, Special Constable Shakir Saifuddin, then asked Low for his identity card.

That was when Low, believing he had committed an offence of public nuisance, held out RM121 to the officer.This was “an attempt to avoid any enforcement action being initiated or taken against him by Shakir and induce Shakir to exercise leniency towards him”, DPP Low said.

The officer rejected the cash and instructed Low to keep his money.

Low’s lawyers said he was in a “disoriented and intoxicated state” at that point of time. Even at 3.19pm that day, his blood alcohol concentration was 99mg/100ml, above the legal limit of 80mg/100ml, a medical report showed.

For trying to bribe a police officer, Low could have been jailed up to five years, or fined up to S$100,000, or both.

Original article source:

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/jail-man-who-tried-bribe-police-thinking-he-was-trouble-law

The post Jail for man who tried to bribe police, thinking he was in trouble with the law first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post Jail for man who tried to bribe police, thinking he was in trouble with the law appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

小明快步上前捡起钱包，想要交还给男子，却发现对方已不在眼前。当时公园里有好些脚踏车骑士，他一时难以准确辨认物主。

Original article source:

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/news/singapore/story20201108-1099230

The post 捡到财物不犯法占为己有可坐牢 first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post 捡到财物不犯法占为己有可坐牢 appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

He teamed up with several other men, found out his targets were playing at Tampines Secondary School, and went over to assault them. The attack left one of the victims with a chipped front tooth.

Juraimi, now aged 50, was sentenced in a district court to nine months and three weeks’ jail on Monday (Oct 26).

This includes three months in lieu of caning, as men aged 50 and above cannot be caned under Singapore law.

The crane operator pleaded guilty to voluntarily causing hurt to Mr Mohammed Rasul Razali, 31; causing hurt with common intention to Mr Muhammad Aniq Rosli, 33; and having an offensive weapon in public.

The court heard that sometime in 2017, Juraimi’s nephews, who were in their 20s, played against Mr Rasul’s team.

There was “some rough play” during the match and one of them was injured, Deputy Public Prosecutor Daphne Lim told the court.

When Juraimi learned of what happened, he became angry and decided to confront those involved, including Mr Rasul.

He searched for their photographs on social media and discovered their playing schedule. He then found out that Mr Rasul and another player involved, identified as Faheez, would be playing on July 23, 2017 at the Tampines Secondary School football field.

That day, Jurami contacted two friends and asked them to join him. One of them then contacted three others.

The six men went over to the school. Four of them, including Juraimi, entered the field area around 5pm, while one stood by the side gate entrance and the last man stayed in his car.

Juraimi approached the players and asked who Faheez was, before spotting Mr Rasul.

He stepped on the other man’s foot and asked if he was Rasul. When he replied yes, Juraimi immediately punched him several times on the face, causing him to fall to the ground.

Other players then went to help Mr Rasul.

At one point, Juraimi retrieved an extendable baton from his pouch and went towards Mr Rasul to attack him again.

When the other victim — Mr Aniq — tried to grab the weapon from him, Juraimi responded by punching his face several times and calling the others to join him.

Another man joined him in punching and kicking Mr Aniq all over his body, even after the victim fell to the ground.

The assailants fled shortly afterwards.

The victims sought medical attention at Changi General Hospital later that day.

Mr Rasul was left with some scratch marks, while Mr Aniq sustained a small chip off his front tooth and an abrasion on his cheek. He also complained of a headache and dizziness.

Court documents did not state if the other assailants have been dealt with.

ONLY INTENDED TO SPEAK TO VICTIMS: LAWYER

In mitigation, Juraimi’s lawyer Gino Hardial Singh said that Juraimi had noticed his nephew “limping badly” after his own match. Another of his nephews’ eye socket was swollen too.

Juraimi had intended to speak to the rival players and make sure this would not happen again, and only brought along a baton in case “things turned awry for him since a football team could consist of up to 20 people”.

Mr Singh said that the first victim had responded in an aggressive manner, which infuriated him.

“We respectfully submit that Juraimi would never have acted the way he did if his loved ones were not injured. The manner in which he behaved was exacerbated by the sheer number of men and their aggressiveness,” the lawyer added.

Mr Singh also noted that his client had ultimately not used the baton in the attack.

For causing hurt, Juraimi could have been jailed up to two years, fined up to S$5,000 or both.

The offence of possessing an offensive weapon in public carries up to three years’ jail and at least six strokes of the cane.

Original article source:

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/man-jailed-over-revenge-attack-footballers-who-roughed-his-nephew-during-match

The post Man jailed over revenge attack on footballers who roughed up his nephew during match first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post Man jailed over revenge attack on footballers who roughed up his nephew during match appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

Justice Choo Han Teck described the defence by 47-year-old Norasharee as an afterthought in his 11-page written judgment dated 14 September 2020 (Monday).

On that same day, counsel for Norasharee, Mr M Ravi, and Deputy Public Prosecutors (DPP) Yang Ziliang and Daphne Lim, had appeared before the judge to make oral arguments on two other grounds which Mr Ravi had raised in an attempt to set aside Norasharee’s conviction. These grounds were dismissed by the judge after hearing oral arguments, but his full reasons for rejecting them can also be found in the written judgment made available immediately after the hearing ended around 10.50am.

Mr Ravi, in response to queries, expressed his intention to raise the argument before the Court of Appeal that Justice Choo had prepared the written judgment well before oral arguments were heard on the new grounds raised, as it was unlikely for the judge to be able to do so within the extremely short span of time between the dismissal of the oral arguments and the written judgment being made available to counsel, and thus giving rise to a powerful possibility of apparent bias by predetermination.

Norasharee was charged for abetment of drug trafficking, namely, by instigating one Mohamad Yazid bin Md Yusof (“Yazid”) to traffic in not less than 120.90g of diamorphine. While the act in question took place in question on 23rd October 2013, Norasharee was only arrested nearly two years later in July 2015.

At the joint trial, Yazid alleged that Norasharee had personally met him at VivoCity on the day in question and told him to collect the drug bundles from a Malaysian courier. Norasharee’s defence at the trial was that he was at VivoCity to have lunch with one Lolo (or “Lolok”), whose real name was Mohammad Faizal bin Zainan Abidin, his supervisor and colleague at Marina Keppel Bay.

The trial judge found, and the Court of Appeal agreed, that Yazid had no motive to frame Norasharee. Both courts also accepted Yazid’s evidence as truthful and found Norasharee’s evidence to be inconsistent. As a result, Norasharee was convicted of the charge he faced and sentenced to death in June 2016. Norasharee’s appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeal in March 2017. His petition to the President for clemency was subsequently rejected.

In July 2018, Norasharee, who was represented by Mr Gino Hardial Singh then, filed an application to re-open his concluded appeal on the basis that his trial and appeal counsel, Mr Amarick Singh Gill, had not called Faizal as a witness against his instructions.

In August last year, the Court of Appeal was of the view that there might have been some miscommunication between Mr Gill and Lolok, and therefore granted leave for Norasharee to adduce fresh evidence on the alibi defence.

When Lolok took the stand, he testified that he would had lunch with Norasharee “almost every day”, and notably he was involved in an argument with Norasharee on the day of the alleged offence – by making fun of a two-tone tan line on Norasharee’s forehead – which was recorded in a logbook onboard the vessel they cleaned.

As against this, Justice Choo ruled that there were material discrepancies between Lolok’s and Norasharee’s accounts of events during the material time. He also found Lolok to be contradictory and inconsistent between written declarations, and Lolok’s “late appearance” further undermined his credibility.

Mr Ravi had further raised the argument that Norasharee had suffered a miscarriage of justice due to non-compliance with the law and other failures in the investigation process by the Central Narcotics Bureau, such as failing to investigate Norasharee’s line of work and place of employment and failing to seize documents therefrom, as the logbook which purportedly supported Lolok’s testimony, could not be recovered and tendered as evidence.

This argument was rejected on the basis that there was “no apparent necessity” for CNB to investigate in such a manner as the authorities were not aware of the significance of Norasharee’s employment and/or his relationship with Lolok.

The correctness of Norasharee’s conviction will now be reviewed by the Court of Appeal at a subsequent hearing to be fixed.

Original article source:

https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/2020/09/14/judge-rejects-fresh-alibi-evidence-adduced-by-death-row-convict-accused-of-masterminding-drug-operation/

The post Judge rejects fresh alibi evidence adduced by death-row convict accused of masterminding drug operation first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post Judge rejects fresh alibi evidence adduced by death-row convict accused of masterminding drug operation appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post ChannelNewsAsia – Interview with Gino – Criminal Lawyer first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post ChannelNewsAsia – Interview with Gino – Criminal Lawyer appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

Remnants of the burning flag fell, leading to seven other flags hung at lower floors getting damaged.

Elson Ong Yong Liang was sentenced to 16 weeks, or about four months, of jail time on Monday (July 27) for his actions, after pleading guilty about a week ago to one count of mischief by fire.

Two other such charges, related to other instances of him setting things on fire, were taken into consideration for sentencing.

The court heard that Ong went drinking at a pub along Selegie Road on Aug 3 last year, a few days before National Day on Aug 9.

At about 5.30am the next day, he took a Grab car home while extremely drunk. It was not stated how much alcohol he had drunk.

He arrived at the Housing and Development Board block where he lived at about 6am, then stood in front of a 13th-floor unit and decided to light a cigarette.

It was not stated if he lived on that floor.

When he noticed a Singapore flag hung along the outer walls of the block, he decided to set it on fire with his lighter.

Several hours later around noon, a 48-year-old man residing in the unit near where Ong had stood smoking called the police to report the burnt flag.

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Kor Zhen Hong sought six months’ jail, reffering to aggravating factors such as public disquiet.

Members of the public passing by “would be quite concerned” if they saw the burning flag, DPP Kor added.

However, he acknowledged that no one had reported that the flag was burning at the time.

Ong’s lawyer, Mr Gino Hardial Singh, said that his client’s actions were “reprehensible” but asked the court to take into account some mitigating factors for sentencing.

He referenced an Institute of Mental Health (IMH) report, which stated that Ong during his teenager years had developed a habit of burning paper when stressed.

He would usually gather flyers at void decks of public housing blocks and burn them in incense bins or grass patches.

A psychiatrist noted that this was a “mild adaptive coping mechanism” to stress, Mr Singh told the court.

Court documents showed that Ong had set fire to newspapers outside another flat on April 4 last year, which destroyed the newspapers, a cupboard and fuse box.

In another incident on an unknown date, he placed his lighter against a metal barricade at a lift lobby causing a construction sign sticker pasted on the barricade to catch fire.

Mr Singh, who asked for three months’ jail instead, said that Ong had learned his lesson and “is now on the right path”.

He had been abused by his father at a young age and his parents divorced when he was six years old, the lawyer added.

In response, DPP Kor said that the IMH report “clearly gives an opinion that he does not suffer from pyromania”. Individuals suffering from it cannot control their impulse to set fire to things.

He was likely drunk and this is generally an aggravating factor, the prosecutor said.

Ong could have been jailed up to seven years and fined.

Original article source:

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/man-jailed-16-weeks-burning-singapore-flag-woodlands-block-7-other-flags-caught-fire

The post Man jailed 16 weeks for burning Singapore flag at Woodlands block; 7 other flags caught fire first appeared on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.

The post Man jailed 16 weeks for burning Singapore flag at Woodlands block; 7 other flags caught fire appeared first on Singapore Criminal Lawyer - Abbots Chambers LLC.